Clean Air For Europe
Cost Benefit Analysis
Reports on developing the CBA Framework
Developments under EC4MACS
European Consortium for Modelling of Air Pollution and Climate Strategies (EC4MACS), 2007-2010
This EU LIFE funded project brings together a consortium of institutions, including AEA and other members of the CAFE CBA consortium, to build and maintain a network of well established modelling tools for a comprehensive integrated assessment of the policy effectiveness of emission control strategies for air pollutants and greenhouse gases.
Objective of Task 8: Benefits Assessment
To quantify the health and environmental benefits of emission control strategies in monetary terms.
Report on the Joint TFIAM/EC4MACS Workshop on Uncertainty Treatment
Interim Assessment Report
Greenhouse gases and air pollutants in the European Union: baseline projections up to 2030.
Interim Methodology Report
The EC4MACS consortium undertook a review of interim methodologies and models used by the consortium by scientific peers, national experts and representatives of stakeholders
Progress Reports
A series of reports documenting developments in model input data and methods.
Development of the Cost Benefit Analyses framework for the CAFE programme
Volume 1: Overview of Methodology (February 2005)
Final methodology for use in the CBA of the Thematic Strategy proposal
Volume 2: Health Impact Assessment (February 2005)
Detailed description of the development of the health impact assessment, including literature review of health impacts and effects valuation, and proposals for final methodology
Volume 3: Uncertainty in the CAFE CBA - Methods and First Analysis (May 2005)
Description of the uncertainty analysis to be undertaken as part of the CBA
Marginal Damage Cost report - Damages per tonne emission of PM2.5, NH3, SO2, NOx and VOCs from each EU25 Member State (excluding Cyprus) and surrounding seas (March 2005)
Methodology report for analysis to generate damage estimates per tonne emission for a range of air pollutants in different situations.
Peer review of the methodology of cost-benefit analysis of the Clear Air for Europe Programme
Expert peer review by Alan Krupnick, Bart Ostro and Keith Bull of the cost-benefit analysis methodology
CAFE-CBA team response to UNICE comments on CBA methodology
Response to comments submitted by UNICE concerning the CAFE CBA methodology
An update on cost-benefit analysis of the CAFE Programme (November 2006)
Report updates some developments in the CBA methodology since publication under the CAFE Programme.